Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 33 of 33

Thread: 35mm f/1.4L vs. 70-200mm f/4L IS

  1. #31
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    23

    Re: 35mm f/1.4L vs. 70-200mm f/4L IS



    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
    if I could only have one I would pick a Canon's top prime in that lens range over a Zoom of any other range

    Well, I am prime fan, too, but if it comes down to the 70-200/4 IS I'd say it is so sharp that it meets the quality of a good prime. Only my EF 100/2.8 IS beats it in terms of sharpness in that range of focal lengths - but that's a macro and certainly one of Canons sharpest lenses.



  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    228

    Re: 35mm f/1.4L vs. 70-200mm f/4L IS



    It won

  3. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    23

    Re: 35mm f/1.4L vs. 70-200mm f/4L IS



    Well, you only could use the 70-200/4 with slowly moving objects indoors. Its IS is very good but it is not fast, indeed. I never use mine indoors, if I then need such a tele zoom range I use a Tamron 70-200/2.8. But I

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •