Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    293

    Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    It seems that I may have thrown a wrench into the gears of progress. This is considered an EPIC FAIL on my behalf and as such I have decided to start a new thread to discuss (thanks to Jan) any possible query or concern that anyone has with Assignment 14. This will also allow to keep the Assignment board clean.


    So swing away and lets try to keep the tomato tossing restricted to thisthread....LOL!


    Emilio
    Canon 450D Gripped, Canon 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM II, Sigma 10-20 EX f/4-5.6, Canon S95

    “There are always two people in every picture: the photographer and the viewer.” -Ansel Adams

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    741

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Emilio, I think you should just make the challenge Depth of Field. Contestants can submit any work that show great depth of field (both forground and background in focus) and thin depth of field (macro shots). Judges and voters should look into the two extremes.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    397

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    I agree completely, Nate. I think it would be interesting to see results for the two "extremes". Also (and I

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    3,863

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Have one finalist from each and then vote for the GRAND PRIZE WINNER!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Elmo


    I see that the original thread is going to be voided. When it reposts some of the confusion is this: Depth of Field, Aperture and Bokeh are three different things. Perhaps if the assignment were specific to one only. Like say "Give me your best Bokeh" or "Aperture wide open only, what can you do?" or "Depth of Field, Go thin and make it work"


    A thin DOF with macro can be a challenge, making the out of focus areas a positive instead of a negative can be an art into itself (and other forms of photography to).


    Thats my suggestions.


    <span style="font-size: 11.8056px;"]With your original assignment post, whatever subject you choose looks like it will be fun.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    The thread for the re-started assignment is online now! Click here to go there.


    For the people who had already posted a photo. Please do again on the new thread. Thanks!


    If there are still any questions or comments, please do so here []

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    397

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Quote Originally Posted by Jan Paalman
    Any type of photography is accepted, as
    long as there is a significant amount of fore- and background difference
    with the use of Depth of Field.

    Does this mean that you are looking for images with shallow depth of field?


    Thanks, and pardon me if I stirr up any confusion regarding the new assignement.


    - Aleks

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Niedra


    Quote Originally Posted by Jan Paalman
    Any type of photography is accepted, as long as there is a significant amount of fore- and background difference with the use of Depth of Field.

    Does this mean that you are looking for images with shallow depth of field?

    Yes that's right. It means a shallow DOF.


    But it doesn't mean that you need to shoot wide open per se. If you've seen the hummingbird photo Bob submitted you might have seen that it was shot at f8 or f11, but still had a significant background/foreground difference and it played very well with DOF.


    This way Emilio eliminated the fact that you needed a very fast lens per se and everyone can join now.


    Hope this is clear,


    Jan

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    397

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Alright, that cleared it up. Thanks Jan and good luck with the assignment!


    - Aleks

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304

    Re: Assignment 14 - DOF - Discussion Thread...



    Your welcome. Since it's Emilio's assignment...any real deep questions about it can be asked to him []


    Looking forward to yourinput on the assignmentAleks []

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •