Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: canon 70-200L better or?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9

    canon 70-200L better or?



    I

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: canon 70-200L better or?



    I think either the 10-22 or the 70-200 would fill a gap for you in terms of everyday use- just depends on which gap you want to fill.


    As for portraits, I think the 70-200 would be better than the 10-22 (10-22 is too wide for general portraits IMO), but the 85 f/1.8 would be my choice out of the three- especially with a crop body.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9

    Re: canon 70-200L better or?



    so what do you think about 17-40L? and what if i chose 70-200L do you think F4 would be enough for a portrait shoot?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: canon 70-200L better or?



    I wouldn

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    246

    Re: canon 70-200L better or?



    I got the 85 f/1.8 back when I had the 500D, and was very pleased when using it for portraits, which is what I got it for. It was a bit long for my everyday use, but I

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9

    Re: canon 70-200L better or?



    Thanks for every recommends you guys have gave me. I

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •