Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?

  1. #1

    should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    i'm sure this has to be in the back of the minds of the powers that be.. but seriously. i want this frickin' lens. i absolutely adore my 24-105, and IS is very important to the work i do.. but there are some times that f/4 simply doesn't cut it. i mean, really.. if this lens existed, wouldn't that pretty much complete canon's lineup? i couldn't think of anything else i could possibly want.. unless they magically find a way to create a zoom with a wider aperture than f/2.8..

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    745

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    What we should really do is start demanding a 17-70 f/2.8 L IS USM.


    If not 17 then 18 at the wide end and if not 70 then something close at the long end. But it seems Canon would give away 1Ds mark III's for free before they come with such a lens [:P]

  3. #3

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    yeeah. i was kinda speaking within the scope of reality.. haha


    just as there are four variations of the 70-200 (two with IS, two without), it seems it would be very easy to drop an IS motor in that lens, repackage it, and call it a day. i'd buy one tomorrow if that were the case.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    1,246

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    I'd prefer a 24-105 2.8L IS.


    Not one upping, just saying.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    112

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    Quote Originally Posted by Keith B


    I'd prefer a 24-105 2.8L IS.


    Not one upping, just saying.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    Aside from it being the size of a garbage can it would weigh a ton.Don't get me wrong, in theory its a nice idea--in reality completely infeasible.


    As for a 24-70IS, it's not a stretch by any means and is very likely IMO though I don't think an online petition will get you one

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Posts
    1,275

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    What I really want is an inexpensive high quality lightweight 17-400mm f/1 IS zoom. That's all.



  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    745

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    No USM? I don't buy it then [:P]

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    Would be nice. I'd buy one for sure.


    I'd also like to see a 35 1.2L II, I'd pay $1900 for that tomorrow.

  9. #9

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    That's the primary reason I've waited to buy one, which in turn is the primary reason I've waited to add a new body (are you listening, Canon?). I know the numbers aren't exactly the same after you account for the crop factor, but on 1.6x body, the EFS 17-55 f/2.8 IS is an exceptional lens. I'd love to have something similar to use with FF or 1.3. The 24-70, especially with its close-focusing ability, would rock with IS.

  10. #10

    Re: should we start a 24-70 f/2.8 L *IS* petition?



    that's my big problem.. i adored my 17-55mm, but recently upgraded to the 5dmkII.. i bought the kit, and the 24-105mm has been great-- a super workhorse lens-- but i still can't do everything that i could do with my 17-55mm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •