Aha, either this is an early April fool's joke, or the answer as to whether the 70-300L is the replacement for the 100-400L: http://dpreview.com/news/1102/11020708canon200400mm.asp
Ciao, Colin
Aha, either this is an early April fool's joke, or the answer as to whether the 70-300L is the replacement for the 100-400L: http://dpreview.com/news/1102/11020708canon200400mm.asp
Ciao, Colin
It
It will be great for those, who have 70-200 series lenses and want more, but do not plan to buy 100-400 []
Just interesting, how it will work with and without and extender? How it will be detatched / reatatched?
Did you see the first guestimate on price..... $7500 USD.[]
Steve U
Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur
@Steve U, well, it can
<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg" id="main_image_wrapper"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg" id="main_image_wrapper"]Here is a shot from the Japanese Canon exhibit coming up, I think ?
<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"][img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/8/4048.003_5B00_1_5D00_.jpg[/img]
<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]Extender is built into the lens and you turn it on or off.
<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]Apparantly.
Steve U
Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur
Originally Posted by Pieter
Much more... I'm going to guess $8500, and even that might be on the low side. Consider the pricing on the new 300/2.8 II and 400/2.8 II. If Canon follows suit, I'd expect this to be a couple of thousand more than the Nikon counterpart, especially since the extender is built-in.