Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    246

    EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    Aha, either this is an early April fool's joke, or the answer as to whether the 70-300L is the replacement for the 100-400L: http://dpreview.com/news/1102/11020708canon200400mm.asp


    Ciao, Colin

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    246

    Re: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    It

  3. #3

    Re: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    It will be great for those, who have 70-200 series lenses and want more, but do not plan to buy 100-400 []


    Just interesting, how it will work with and without and extender? How it will be detatched / reatatched?

  4. #4
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942

    Re: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    Did you see the first guestimate on price..... $7500 USD.[]
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  5. #5

    Re: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    @Steve U, well, it can

  6. #6
    Moderator Steve U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,942

    Re: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    <span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg" id="main_image_wrapper"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg" id="main_image_wrapper"]Here is a shot from the Japanese Canon exhibit coming up, I think ?


    <span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"][img]/resized-image.ashx/__size/550x0/__key/CommunityServer-Discussions-Components-Files/8/4048.003_5B00_1_5D00_.jpg[/img]


    <span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]Extender is built into the lens and you turn it on or off.


    <span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]<span org_alt="?????????" org_height="600" org_width="800" org_url="/img/dcw/docs/425/556/003.jpg"]Apparantly.
    Steve U
    Wine, Food and Photography Student and Connoisseur

  7. #7
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,845

    Re: EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM EXTENDER 1.4x



    Quote Originally Posted by Pieter
    The nikon 200-400 costs $6800, so the Canon won't be much less.

    Much more... I'm going to guess $8500, and even that might be on the low side. Consider the pricing on the new 300/2.8 II and 400/2.8 II. If Canon follows suit, I'd expect this to be a couple of thousand more than the Nikon counterpart, especially since the extender is built-in.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •