<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"]<span style="font-size: small;"]<span style="font-family: Arial;"]Does it make sense? An $1800 Full frame DSLR from Canon&hellip;<o></o>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"]<span style="font-size: small;"]<span style="font-family: Arial;"]Back to 2005 Canon was the first one to offer a full frame 5D at $3000 and that triggered a revolution. Although today the 5D MarkII is an excellent camera but it&rsquo;s no longer along in its category &ndash; Nikon has a D700 for the same price which does a much better job on high ISO and speed. Sony has an A900 which can&rsquo;t quite stand against the Canon IMO but offers just a little bit more resolution.<o></o>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"]<span style="font-size: small;"]<span style="font-family: Arial;"]Would it make sense to bring the full frame DSLR&rsquo;s price down once again? Such as a FF DSLR with 16MP or so like a downgraded 5D II that comes @ $1800. There seems to be quite of a price jump from the 50D to the 5D II though. I also assume that Canon pumped up their XSi so much from the previous XTi is to leave space for the upcoming XS at that time, which is just a refurbished XTi IMO. If the same philosophy is to be applied to the 5D II, a FF DSLR like a refreshed 5D MarkI will see the light shortly.<o></o>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"]<span style="font-size: small;"]<span style="font-family: Arial;"]Am I wrong, again?... [*-)]<o></o>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;" class="MsoNormal"]<span style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;" lang="EN-US"]<span style="font-size: small;"]<span style="font-family: Arial;"]Benjamin<o></o>