Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: RAW Critique

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #14
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,588
    Quote Originally Posted by Zach View Post
    Brant: first thanks for taking the time to take samples, second I can't see the pic's just a little "x"
    Right....and one "x" has more detail and noise

    Ok...I am not sure what is going on. I can see everything on my computer, but then I checked it from my work computer and all I see are the "X"s.

    Then I tried to add the images again to the original post, and it won't save the changes.

    So, here they are...hopefully....

    "Auto" corrected of the JPEG file in LR6:


    The correct JPEG with shadows/exposure brought up:



    And the RAW file with the same changes made in LR6:




    I am intentionally targeting a known weak spot of this generation of Canon's sensors, shadow detail/noise. From what I've seen, the sensors from the 7DII and 5Ds (r) are better with shadow detail. But I also looked at a properly exposed waterfall. It was better, but I would still say there was more detail in the RAW file.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	RAW Shadows 192 -0179.jpg 
Views:	520 
Size:	186.8 KB 
ID:	2491   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	JPEG Shadows 192 -0179.jpg 
Views:	487 
Size:	187.3 KB 
ID:	2490   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Kayak adjustments.jpg 
Views:	504 
Size:	19.2 KB 
ID:	2489  

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •