Hello all.

I am in a process getting the 5DSr and the thing i am now battling myself is:

Will be getting the 16-35 f/2.8 L II lens, but then starts the pain do i want to have 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens or the 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens.

I am very fond of the idea of the f/2.8 but then again, i know i know i curse those nice shots ruined without IS.

The main use for the lens would be my travelling lens, and i am wondering would there actually be any need for other than the 16-35?

The 24-105 range just sounds so tempting to keep my options wider and naturally to have the IS to support my shaky hands .

Have read those reviews on the site more than enough times and still....cannot decide. What i understand is that the image quality between those 2 is not that big? Or is it?

Any ideas to solve this dilemma is more than welcome =)

best regards,
Kari