Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Two new EF lenses?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,201
    Oops so much for a deal on a bundle.

    Agree with brant. Was hoping for better charts. Will see what it does in the real world
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Newfoundland, Canada
    Posts
    533
    Interesting...thanks for the insight Neuro and Kayaker. I always thought (and to some degree read on-line) that most people only shot the superteles on tripods/monopods. That wouldn't suit my photo-habits as I like to hike and wouldn't particularly like to wait around in one place hoping something interesting would happen by. My wildlife/bird shots are generally opportunistic when I am travelling or hiking or just doing something else with my family. Only on special occasions am I able to predict a time or location to try for a wildlife shot (ie on whale watching tours or looking for puffins).

    To avoid completely hijacking the thread...I'm going to be watching the release and reviews of both these lenses. I have the current 24-105L and 16-35L 2.8 II so I would consider upgrades to both to be welcome. Not sure I could justify any price premium, but definitely would consider. I also have the 5dIII so the camera upgrade will be watched as well. Potentially I would consider upgrading the camera and getting the new 24-105 as a bundle and selling my current versions. As for the 16-35 I would consider the upgrade or potentially changing to the f4 version depending on reviews (and of course new cost vs resale value of my current lens).

    Stephen

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,201
    Good point on the bundle
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Terra Firma
    Posts
    158
    This is an older thread, but here's a good question for Bryan....

    Bryan, you exchanged the 24-105 f/4 L for the 24-70 f/4 as your preferred walk around lens, I believe.

    If the second gen 24-104 f/4 turns out to be as good, optically, are you going to switch back?

  5. #5
    Administrator Bryan Carnathan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Selinsgrove, PA USA
    Posts
    339
    Definitely!!! I'm anxious to get my hands on this one.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,747
    Looks like the 24-105 II sacrificed sharpness in the center for slightly better edge performance. I will also say, I see less CA, and better distortion control. While both can be corrected in Post, I am a believer that everything done in post has some affect on IQ. Also, I was never impressed with the IS on V1. If that is truly up to 4 stops, that would be a huge improvement.

    All that said, my 24-70 II isn't going anywhere. That is my general purpose zoom and I am loving the images I get from it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •