Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Everypixel--Picture rating

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    3,382

    Everypixel--Picture rating

    Ok....This was fun. So, Sean just posted this on TDP news. I am still not convinced that they do not have people sitting in a room messing with us, but they claim to be using software to rate photos. Their goal is to rate or, separate out, the better stock photos.

    Of course, I had to try it a bit.

    It likes this frog picture:

    Name:  everypixel frog 2.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  126.3 KB


    But not this one:

    Name:  everypixel frog 3.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  135.8 KB




    It likes this shot of a capuchin monkey:

    Name:  everypixel monkey 1.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  137.3 KB



    more than this shot:

    Name:  everypixel monkey 2.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  138.7 KB



    Waterfall...YES!

    Name:  everypixel waterfall.jpg
Views: 63
Size:  168.5 KB



    Interesting. I did a number of other comparisons and have to say, generally, I agree. Even though some of my shots were rated very low (not just the second frog pic), definitely those that were rated higher I would agree were better shots.
    Last edited by Kayaker72; 04-13-2017 at 05:34 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member clemmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Posts
    1,270
    How long does it take?
    I even reduced the image to 1mb and it still seems to just run and run?
    Mark

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    3,382
    I ran into that twice as well. I ended up opening a new window and that helped. When working, I'd say 5-10 seconds per picture.

  4. #4
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,228
    I ran into a similar stuck-loading once (had to reload), and I was only uploading 2048px versions of my images. My thoughts mirrored yours, Brant, and I think I uploaded about a dozen different images. What I was most impressed with was the tag generator; it even generated the tag "Ultraviolet" for a black light image I uploaded. While the rating system is entertaining, I think the tag suggestions it produces can be genuinely useful.

  5. #5
    Senior Member clemmb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Posts
    1,270
    It worked good for me this morning. I think after the posting on the forum there must have been too many people trying it at the same time. Moat of mine I tried are 90% and above. I did however have a few very low. The tag generator is pretty amazing.
    Mark

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    165
    I found the results pretty confusing. Some really similar pictures could jump from 20% to 80% with just a slightly different angle or framing. But when one of my picture was rated at 100% I changed my mind and now I think the algorithm is perfectly accurate . Took me some time to get it though.

    The tag generator is indeed interesting but not errorless either. It mixed up fog with snow for example. On the other hand, I was pretty impressed that it could identify the European Alps on my pictures. How does it know it's not another moutain range ? Edit : after some more testing, some of my pics were localized in Canada. Didn't remember going there lately...
    Last edited by Tounis; 04-18-2017 at 12:38 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •