Heads up folks, Canon lens pricing went up this afternoon.

[40Doodle]

I noticed just this afternoon that Adorama, B&H, Amazon and others raised the price of the EF 100-400 from $1360 to $1400 (after current Canon rebate applied). If you were just about ready to "pull the trigger" on a lens, better get out and look for a reseller that had not yet raised prices.


I found an article on Bloomberg.com today that speaks to what happened to the Yen:


"The Japanese yen weakened versus 15 of the 16 most-active
currencies on prospects that gains in U.S. stocks will spur
investors to buy higher-yielding assets. The results of the
stress tests, due out at 5 p.m. in Washington today, will show
JPMorgan Chase &
Co. doesn’t need a deeper reserve against losses, people
familiar with the matter said yesterday."


Reading that article, it would appear to me that prices for these lenses may remain up or go higher for awhile. There are some resellers that have not yet adjusted prices, but that may change soon. I think the big boys (Adorama, B&H, ect) were just faster on the draw due to these currency changes.


Rick

[Keith B]

Yeah the 70-200 2.8 IS I was contemplating has jumped up $100 negating half of that rebate. The 16-35 jump $50 so I don't feel bad about paying $1450 for a couple weeks ago. It almost looks like they halved all the rebates.

[Bob]

<span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: black; font-size: 10pt;"]The excuse that Canon has raised pricesso the retailer needs to increase their pricesis not totally valid.<o></o>


<span style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: black; font-size: 10pt;"]The lenses in their inventory were purchased at the lower prices and should not increase in price until they make new purchases from Canon. Just another way the retailers are taking advantage of the rebate making them of less value to the customer.<o></o>

[Keith B]

J&amp;R has not raised their prices as of this writing. I was able to snag the 70-200 2.8 IS for $1499. I wasn't ready to buy it but that lens at that price was too hard to pass up.

[Keith B]

<span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt;"]The excuse that Canon has raised pricesso the retailer needs to increase their pricesis not totally valid.


<span style="font-family:'Arial','sans-serif';color:black;font-size:10pt;"]The lenses in their inventory were purchased at the lower prices and should not increase in price until they make new purchases from Canon. Just another way the retailers are taking advantage of the rebate making them of less value to the customer.

I don't know what all the resellers deals are but some of them don't actually pay for inventory until it is purchased. So when Canon raises the prices the retailers usually have to follow suit to maintain there profit margin.

[Don Burkett]

What's interesting is how many lens B&amp;H are out of stock or backordered on.

[steve_m]

I was waiting for the rebates to come out this spring. I guess waiting for a rebate didn't work this time.


I'm not sure how this will impact sales. I can't imagine that sales will increase as the price increases.

[Bob]

Keith B


I doubt that Canon will carry the inventory cost of the retailer. If so, I should open a estore.

[Keith B]

Keith B


I doubt that Canon will carry the inventory cost of the retailer. If so, I should open a estore.

Read this from above.


http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2009.04.24/state-of-the-slr-industry-2009


I'm sure small Joe Shmoe places don't get the credits B&amp;H will, but read the part about Wolf/Ritz and 40 million lost in lenses.

[peety3]

Read this from above.


[url="http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2009.04.24/state-of-the-slr-industry-2009]http://www.lensrentals.com/news/2009.04.24/state-of-the-slr-industry-2009[/url]


I'm sure small Joe Shmoe places don't get the credits B&amp;H will, but read the part about Wolf/Ritz and 40 million lost in lenses.
<div style="clear: both;"]</div>

Please don't spread FUD. It's not $40M lost, it's $40M valued as an asset line item in a bankruptcy filing. Those lenses weren't stolen or destroyed, they're perfectly sellable goods. Wolf/Ritz can and does sell lenses, often at a higher price than Adorama/B&amp;H/etc. but there's no reason that they can't be sold. Wolf/Ritz can sell them at their normal pricing, sell them closer to superstore pricing and make less profit per item but move them faster, or sell them below superstore pricing at even less profit or possibly a small loss. Regardless, we the community can and will buy them (somehow). The manufacturers can still get most or all of their wholesale cost back, assuming they haven't been paid already (I suspect they're going to be slow-paid under the bankruptcy filing terms for recently-delivered stock, as it was probably sent on net terms of some form).