Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 70-200 mm --new releases

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    3,765

    70-200 mm --new releases

    So, new lenses are always fun and Canon recently announced the 70-200 f/4 IS II and 70-200 f/2.8 III. I consider both the lenses these updates are replacing to be classics, among the best Canon has to offer. The update to the 70-200 f/2.8 III sounds like it is more about coatings (maybe there is more, but so far, coatings...and a slightly different color of white), the 70-200 f/4 IS was updated with a new optical formula.

    Bryan just released his first take on the IQ...I have to say, I see a bit of an improvement to contrast (most prominently at 135 mm), but this is very slight.

    @ 70 mm:
    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=0&APIComp=0

    @135 mm:

    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=2&APIComp=0


    @200 mm
    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=3&APIComp=0

    Granted, that is the issue with trying to update a classic lens, it is already so good. And a bit better contrast could actually result in a noticeable improvement in some pics.

    I do not own the 70-200 f/4 IS, but I own and I really do like the 70-300 L....you can see the improvement of comparing the 70-200 f/4 II and 70-300 L at 200 mm:

    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=3&APIComp=2

    While the 70-200 f/4 IS II and 70-300 L are similar in my mind (compact, light weight telephoto lenses), the 100-400L II and 200-400 f/4 are bigger and much bigger, but still, it helps to compare IQ at 200 mm:

    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=2&APIComp=2

    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=0&APIComp=0

    Overall, it is not hard to see why the 70-200 f/4 IS was a classic. I am all set, but looks like a nice lens.
    Last edited by Kayaker72; 07-05-2018 at 05:44 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,292
    I own a 70-200 F4L IS and I really cannot see a good reason to upgrade to the new version. Maybe I'm overlooking things, but I have no complains at all on my 50MP camera.
    If the new version was black though....I would have swapped without a doubt. I would look less professional and people would have less expectations. (which would reflect the reality of most results somewhat more )

  3. #3
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    910
    The lenses are good enough now that upgrades are a harder sell. I find my 6D and 80D image quality plenty good enough so lenses that are marginal improvements are clearly not worth the money. I haven't bought a lens in a few years now.

    Dave

  4. #4
    The technical reason for the lenses being white is that the fluorite lenses inside are sensitive to heat. A bright color keeps the lens cooler.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •