Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: JPEG vs PNG

  1. #1
    Senior Member Zach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    110

    JPEG vs PNG

    hey guys i was wondering which was better for my pics in y'alls opinion

    i used to save my post processed photos in jpeg format but i have found that the png file format save much more quality, so i have switched to png as my main format, i don't mind the large file size.

    what are y'alls thoughts on this?
    Last edited by Zach; 12-08-2019 at 04:15 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Jonathan Huyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Canmore, Alberta
    Posts
    928
    I don't know anything about the subject, but I did find this:


  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,325
    JPEG has lossy compression which throws away data the eye typically doesn't see (unless you really drop the quality slider!) assuming you're not viewing it up close or anything. Every print service in the world will take a JPEG. Bad if you're going to keep opening, modifying, and saving.

    PNG has lossless compression, handles transparency, and all sorts of good stuff. Great for editing and re-editing (though you'll probably use psd to keep layers, etc.). You'd have to ask your print service if they support PNG, of if you need to do your final export as JPEG.
    On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr | On the web - http://www.GrassStainedPhoto.com
    1DsII | 7D | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 18-135mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •