Page 4 of 22 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 232

Thread: R5? R6? Anyone?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Tounis View Post
    Oh and if I were into bird photography I would completely agree with you ! I just feel I don't need such an impressive AF. But that's just me.
    Better bring a big lens if photographing birds using full frame. Crop sensors are better for the guy without big whites.

    Dave

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    437
    I would someday love to have a camera WITHOUT video capabilities, since i don't have any use of them. Give me just camara, should be cheaper and suffer no overheating issues like R6 and R5 have :P

    But yeah, R6 with th 600mm and both extenders, good enough since the nice R6 af on both =)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    So the 5 has 8 stop IBIS.
    "Stabilization gets better if you pair the in-body stabilizers with a compatible RF- or EF-mount lens."

    So has anyone found the list of EF lenses that it is compatible with?
    How would this stack with the in body IS of my 500mm?
    This might be a bigger improvement and benefit to eliminate noise in low light than having the lower mp sensor. I can get my 500mm down to 1/250 before shake really becomes an issue. Getting it down even lower would be huge.


  4. #4
    Senior Member Jonathan Huyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Canmore, Alberta
    Posts
    1,250
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    So the 5 has 8 stop IBIS.
    "Stabilization gets better if you pair the in-body stabilizers with a compatible RF- or EF-mount lens."

    So has anyone found the list of EF lenses that it is compatible with?
    How would this stack with the in body IS of my 500mm?
    This might be a bigger improvement and benefit to eliminate noise in low light than having the lower mp sensor. I can get my 500mm down to 1/250 before shake really becomes an issue. Getting it down even lower would be huge.

    What are you shooting with the 500 mm lens, that would benefit from a slower shutter speed? If it's birds or other wildlife, they will need to be perfectly still to get the shot. I can see where the IBIS is a game changer for people that want to use the camera for walking around, especially with that new 100-500 RF zoom. But when you are attaching it to a big lens like the 500 f/4, you're probably using a tripod so the lens IS should be more than enough to deal with the regular vibrations.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Huyer View Post
    What are you shooting with the 500 mm lens, that would benefit from a slower shutter speed? If it's birds or other wildlife, they will need to be perfectly still to get the shot. I can see where the IBIS is a game changer for people that want to use the camera for walking around, especially with that new 100-500 RF zoom. But when you are attaching it to a big lens like the 500 f/4, you're probably using a tripod so the lens IS should be more than enough to deal with the regular vibrations.
    The early morning blind, big game like deer seldom moves that fast. Even the bobcats like to stop and look around. Carrying a tripod in the field is not always the best option and I seldom do.

    If your maxed out in the evening or morning, an extra IS stop might get you 7 to 8 more minutes with a lower shutter speed for a shot that you normally wouldn't even try.

    More IS would help in all situations where you do not have the tripod.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,172
    I almost pucked uo the R, the R5 is likely in the bag soon. Why?

    Here is my logic.

    I loved the resolution of the 5DsR that I rented... close enough.

    Mirrorless, I almost went to mf4/3 for the benefit of no flappy mirror. Ta da.

    Twistt Flippy!!!!! Man everytime I borrow my friends 80d the touch flippy gets me and when I go back to the 5d3 aaaarrrggghh

    My sigma art lenses now are IBIS and that is cool.

    34 mp Still capture from movie frames for "net" published photos moves the equivalent fps to 30?!?!? Belly LOL!!

    I have use for movies/vids in wild life shooting.... wonder how close the shutter speed can get to the fps.... cant shoot 30 fps at 1/15th.

    Saw the silent disables aeb... darn but 12 fps with no mirror is same as my 1dx.1 so that works.

    I will be getting it in the fall. Too freaking hot in FL right now. Hope the supply chain is decent.

    STAY SAFE AND UNINFECTED. Lets just say I am way deep the epidemiology of cobid and while dying is bad the rate of permanent disability is the story missed by the media.
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    Quote Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles View Post
    STAY SAFE AND UNINFECTED. Lets just say I am way deep the epidemiology of cobid and while dying is bad the rate of permanent disability is the story missed by the media.
    The media has missed many things. They dilute the reports on symptoms so you have to much information and do not focus on the major things you should be watching. It is Silent Hypoxia, if you get it buy yourself a pulse oximeter and if your oxygen starts getting below 90% get to the emergency room. This thing kills by stealing your ability to take in oxygen.

    Wear masks, social distance and be safe. We have been there and back already. It is no fun and scary as hell.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,593
    Some wildlife reviews for the R5 are starting to come in.

    First impressions here, mostly, I am impressed watching eye AF on BIF:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sx8Divtkhe4

    A german wildlife photographer. More initial impressions and some great photos:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krpI9-KYVcA

  9. #9
    Senior Member Fast Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferndale WA
    Posts
    1,175
    I'd have to agree. Besides we have good options now with 600mm f/6.3 lenses by Sigma and Tamron. They are far more useable for BIF and are reasonably priced (Relatively speaking of course.).

    I see them as compact reach, and that encompasses a lot of uses but hardly ideal or even usable for BIF.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    437
    This is quite enlighting discussion about the R6 and the f/11 lenses.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5Re4hpBYfk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •