I have not heard of wet scanning, but I have not researched the subject either. When I was still shooting professionally with my Bronica ETRsi 6x4.5 I had my film developed by a reputable professional lab. I looked back at one of the old files from them. Their scanner was giving me 11MP files. I'm sure that was pretty big in 2006. Last year I shot some 35mm film. The lab files were 24MP.Originally Posted by HDNitehawk
I remember from the old 6x4.5s when my lab went from direct printing to scanning then printing I did not see any real change in the quality. Not that my eye at the time would have picked up on it,
Reply With Quote