Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: RF 800mm and 1200mm lenses, do they make sense?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Fast Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferndale WA
    Posts
    1,158

    RF 800mm and 1200mm lenses, do they make sense?

    The 800mm doesn't make a lot of sense to own in my honest opinion. It is much more expensive than a 600mm f/4 and extender and less sharp. If you compare it to the EF 800mm f/5.6, the EF version is significantly sharper. It is less modern, yes. But at the large price spread and lesser IQ. How much good is it? Up to you to decide, I don't see the value in it personally when the RF 600 exists for thousands less and better or the EF 800mm as an options as well.

    The 1200mm while ridiculously priced, at least does something slightly better than the RF 600mm f/4 based on the MTF charts. But not better than the EF 800mm f/5.6. So is it really worth the 18k price point and significant IQ shortcomings? Again it is up to you, but I don't feel like it is. Even if you wanted the build of the more modern lenses the IQ difference is not huge compared to the RF 600 and the cost savings are dramatic.

    I think if Canon really wanted to dress up an existing lens, do that with the outgoing EF 800mm f/5.6. Give us some updated optics, update the build and wiring to the more modern RF mount and boom! You have a lens that justifies the price tag. Because it has to have costed something to revise the optics of the RF 800mm and 1200mm and make a new lens barrel even with all it's shared components. I think the funds were far better off being invested in updating the EF 800. Even if it costed more, you had a standalone optical design that would sell much better. Because it offers you something you can't get by simply adding and extender on a already existing lens.

    This is my thoughts after reading Bryans excellent reviews (As always) and his extremely useful ISO charts. But I'm of the opinion, even if I was willing to spend the money that I wouldn't because there are options that have better IQ. Even with all their caveats.'

    It's kinda a long rant of a post, but these are just my feelings on it. I wouldn't step on anyone's toes if they bought them and I wish anyone who owns one all the best.
    Last edited by Fast Glass; 07-23-2022 at 07:57 AM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,088
    If a person doesn't mind the weight, go with the EF 600mm F/4 II and an extender.
    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=0&APIComp=0

    And if Weight is an issue, go with the RF 600mm F/4.


    https://www.the-digital-picture.com/...mp=0&APIComp=0

    I think Canon called this stream lined engineering. Maybe they could slap another built in 2x on the 1200mm and have a 2400mm to sell for $40,000.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Fast Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ferndale WA
    Posts
    1,158
    I agree with you 100%, the 600mm f/4 IS II is a fantastic lens. Very versatile and still very modern. If you are into computers at all reminds me of some of Nvidia's Titan version of their graphics cards, 25% price hike for maybe a few percent improvement. In the one game I care about it is virtually the same.
    Last edited by Fast Glass; 07-23-2022 at 09:25 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •