Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: 300mm F2.8 vs. 200 F1.8 + Extenders

  1. 05-19-2009, 11:56 PM #11
    JJphoto
    JJphoto is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    758

    Re: 300mm F2.8 vs. 200 F1.8 + Extenders



    what's "a low end 300mm f2.8 non IS lens'?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 05-20-2009, 06:49 AM #12
    RonG
    RonG is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    36

    Re: 300mm F2.8 vs. 200 F1.8 + Extenders



    While I absolutely respect Bryan's opinion and am addicted to his comparisons and reviews, there are other opinions out there. I am including link to Sports Shooter and Fred Miranda regarding the 200 f1.8. I think it's kinda like comparing a 1996 Ferrari vs. a 2007 ferrari. Neither one sucks.


    http://www.sportsshooter.com/gear_profile.html?id=83


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM vs. EF-S 17-85 f/4-4.6 IS USM | 100-400 or 400 F5.6 or 300 f4 IS »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules