Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
Oh that's nasty, I did not see that...
Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
Well, the Tamron 17-50 f2.8 offers you better image quality, but at the same range and without IS. In my opinion you better have one strong general lens than 1 longer zooming lens that is weaker... Once you see what a better lens can do, you'll get my point.
A second lens: prime or zoom would make more sense I think.
For just the extra zoom, you could also look at the Canon EF-S 55-250 IS. Second hand they are really cheap and you do get Image Stabilization which can be very helpful at longer focal lengths at minimum apertures of f5.6
Personally I think the 18-135 is too expensive for what it offers over the 18-55. But that's my thought.
Jan




Reply With Quote