Originally Posted by neuroanatomist
Me too!! I've been trying to justify another camera equipment expense to the boss. Not getting much sympathy. [:'(]
Paul
Me too!! I've been trying to justify another camera equipment expense to the boss. Not getting much sympathy. [:'(]
Paul
All the pictures in this album were taken with the MT-24 with no diffusers. If I were in a mood to complain, I would complain about the reflections, not the quality of the light. But I've used it a lot and am very glad I have it.
She just saw me looking on B&H and said....... "You have a problem."
[:$]
You know DoggieDoc, a lot of the reviews I read on the 24EX were from Dentist offices.....Wouldn't a Vet need one of these to take pictures of Fido's teeth.
Neuro,
I had seen a post on a different web site describing how to do the exact same thing. I also heard others say they would take the Sto-Fen's and then cover them with materials to further diffuse the light. I guess it would be a trial and error thing. I want to keep the light as soft as possible.
Jon,
The samples were very good. It is "reflection" I was worrying about, would a person be able to get the light soft enough to eliminate this completely.
Sounds reasonable enough to me!
I've never tried diffusers with the 24EX, so I don't know. (The reflections actually don't bother me).
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote