Results 1 to 10 of 70

Thread: Canon EF-S 10-22mm vs. Tokina 11-16mm -> FIGHT!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    29
    in this image, at 2.8F, why the focus is not very tight?? i can see the background is not totally out of focus. and landscapes are clicked at smaller apertures for large span in focus, then how do we utilise big aperture?
    can i see some more examples where wide lenses are used with big apertures?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ 86 View Post
    in this image, at 2.8F, why the focus is not very tight?? i can see the background is not totally out of focus. and landscapes are clicked at smaller apertures for large span in focus, then how do we utilise big aperture?
    can i see some more examples where wide lenses are used with big apertures?
    24mm with 5D II, F2.5, ISO800 1/15, notice the OOF areas around the edges


    The Melting Pot0007 by hdnitehawk01, on Flickr

    35mm, F/1.8, ISO 3200, 1/50, an example of fighting to get enough speed to get a shot in almost total darkness. I had no lighting behind me and no flash used.


    Festival of Lights Wagon by hdnitehawk01, on Flickr

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    189
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ 86 View Post
    in this image, at 2.8F, why the focus is not very tight?? i can see the background is not totally out of focus. and landscapes are clicked at smaller apertures for large span in focus, then how do we utilise big aperture?
    can i see some more examples where wide lenses are used with big apertures?
    DJ, this shot focused on a very near-field object. Given the focal length the statue may have only been a foot from the lens. The fact that the building is recognizable as anything other than a blur is a result of using such a short focal length lens.

    If someone were to frame the same scene of the statue with a telephoto at the same f/# the magnified blur of the building would have been unrecognizable as such. Each style of photo has its appeal. That's the artistic portion of photography.

    Moving to SLR's you're leaving the world of point-and-clicks with micro-sized sensors. SLRs are far more capable but also more complicated and difficult to drive well. The SLR community does not speak of magnification powers per se. Instead everything is discussed in terms of the framing of the image relative to a 35mm negative. Any given focal length will capture light from a given arc in front of the lens. That's what ends up on the sensor. After taking that into account then the f/# and focal length and object/background will dictate what's in or out of focus.

    If you're truly only interested in shooting landscapes that cover a wide angle with a narrow aperture then pretty much any lens with f < 35 mm will do. Obviously the more expensive the lens the better the image quality. However, most of us are not so single-minded in out photography desires. So having a mixture of focal lengths and the option for wide apertures allows flexibility.

  4. #4
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918
    Quote Originally Posted by DJ 86 View Post
    can i see some more examples where wide lenses are used with big apertures?

    EOS 5D Mark II, EF 35mm f/1.4L USM, 1/30 s, f/1.4, ISO 100

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •