Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: I think I solved my tripod/angled center column dilemma (fingers crossed)!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    759
    I was planning on posting this ages ago (i've had the tripod for a month or so at least), but work and life got in the way.
    Anyway, for anyone wondering about the carrying capacity of my tripod tilted, here's an example:
    Vanguard Alta Pro 283CT, Acra-Swiss Monoball P0, Kirk 3" clamp, no-name brand lens plate, Zeiss Sonnar 180/2.8 for Pentacon Six (about 1.2kg but it takes great portraits), 7D with Kirk L-bracket. So there's probably 2-2.5kg of camera on it. Plus a 1kg bottle of water on the other end of the pole, and a 70-300L + EFs 15-85 in the rock-bag around the legs (I didn't have any rocks inside). The camera is actually vertically outside the triangle of the feet, but the water-bottle and extra lenses brings the Centre of Gravity back within so it doesn't tip over.
    Not as solid as with a vertical column, but if you have to bend this way it's solid enough, i'd trust it for a few second exposure in mild wind...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	P3012352R.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	82.7 KB 
ID:	608

    (sorry about the quality of the photo, my good camera was unavailable to take the shot with...)
    An awful lot of electrons were terribly inconvenienced in the making of this post.
    Gear Photos

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    3,863
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr Croubie View Post
    I was planning on posting this ages ago (i've had the tripod for a month or so at least), but work and life got in the way.
    Anyway, for anyone wondering about the carrying capacity of my tripod tilted, here's an example:
    Vanguard Alta Pro 283CT, Acra-Swiss Monoball P0, Kirk 3" clamp, no-name brand lens plate, Zeiss Sonnar 180/2.8 for Pentacon Six (about 1.2kg but it takes great portraits), 7D with Kirk L-bracket. So there's probably 2-2.5kg of camera on it. Plus a 1kg bottle of water on the other end of the pole, and a 70-300L + EFs 15-85 in the rock-bag around the legs (I didn't have any rocks inside). The camera is actually vertically outside the triangle of the feet, but the water-bottle and extra lenses brings the Centre of Gravity back within so it doesn't tip over.
    Not as solid as with a vertical column, but if you have to bend this way it's solid enough, i'd trust it for a few second exposure in mild wind...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	P3012352R.jpg 
Views:	46 
Size:	82.7 KB 
ID:	608

    (sorry about the quality of the photo, my good camera was unavailable to take the shot with...)
    I'm not sure if your arm is longer than mine (man, that sounds wierd) but I don't think I would want mine much longer with this set-up. I just wish I would have discovered these angled columns/utility arms years ago!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •