Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: Lens for dog agility / action

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,497
    So it seems the consensus is we should keep saving our pennies, until can afford the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM II.

    The 70-200mm f/4L IS USM *should* work, as *should* the 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM. It's a coin toss as to whether people prefer the constant f/4 vs. the longer reach.

    The next question becomes, if the f/2.8 AF sensor slows down AF, is it actually going to reduce servo performance? The camera will have to work harder to lock onto a bouncing non-constant speed object. Will the increases sensitivity combined with the slower performance mean fewer focus locks, and therefore, fewer shots?

    I'm glad there isn't a simple answer to all of this.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South West Ontario
    Posts
    466
    The really short answer is that both the f4 and the f2.8 II versions of the 70-200 focus really quickly.

  3. #3
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Lane View Post
    There is some additional info here:


    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/C.../Aperture.aspx
    And even more here:

    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/P...Explained.aspx

    And here:

    http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/report/2011/09/

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Lane View Post
    I was referring to the concept that twice as much light from the larger aperture was being directed towards the AF Sensor, which will increase AF acquisition speed, and why an f/2.8 lens set at 5.6 will focus faster than a f/5.6 lens set at 5.6. Of course this will be accentuated in lower light conditions and/or at faster shutter-speeds in which the aperture will be open for a shorter duration.
    I expect we're somehow talking at crossed purposes, here. Fast shutter speeds have nothing to do with AF acquisition speed - phase detect AF is performed with the mirror down and the shutter closed. An an f/2.8 lens set at 5.6 will not necessarily focus faster than an f/5.6 lens set at f/5.6 - depending on the scene, it may actually be slower. If there's extreme defocus, the f/5.6 sensor will be used first, then the f/2.8 sensor - in that case, with an f/5.6 lens the AF would be finished after the f/5.6 step, whereas with an f/2.8 lens (aperture chosen for the shot is irrelevant for AF), the AF system would subsequently refine the focus with the f/2.8 sensor - therefore, the f/5.6 lens would actually focus faster (albeit less accurately).

    The bottom line is that true AF speed is a composite of many factors - the specific lens being used (not just the aperture - some f/2.8 lenses focus faster, due to better motors or smaller/lighter focusing elements), the camera (faster Digic means faster calculations, 1-series bodies drive the lens AF motor faster due to the higher voltage), and the scene being focused on (a beat up old 300D with an 18-55mm kit lens will focus faster on a contrasty starburst focus target than 1D IV with 400/2.8 II will focus on an elephant in the fog at twilight).

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidEccleston View Post
    The next question becomes, if the f/2.8 AF sensor slows down AF, is it actually going to reduce servo performance? The camera will have to work harder to lock onto a bouncing non-constant speed object. Will the increases sensitivity combined with the slower performance mean fewer focus locks, and therefore, fewer shots?
    Practically speaking, no. An f/2.8 lens activates both f/5.6 and f/2.8 sensors, and as I stated above, AI Servo actually relies more on the f/5.6 sensors. The 70-200 II is a very fast-focusing lens, at least on my 7D and 5DII.
    Last edited by neuroanatomist; 06-11-2012 at 05:44 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist View Post
    I expect we're somehow talking at crossed purposes, here. Fast shutter speeds have nothing to do with AF acquisition speed -
    Fair enough!

    I was trying to infer something else, although poorly, that the latter f/5.6 max aperture lens will focus slower in lower light (due to smaller maximum aperture, less light hitting the sensor) and that this 2-stop loss (4 times less light) as compared to the f/2.8 lens, and that this situation will be worsened when you need faster shutter-speeds, because you are approaching the limits of the lens.

    I'm assuming similair lighting conditions and that the user maintains his/her subject on target.

    I love your article, by the way!

    Rich
    Last edited by Richard Lane; 06-11-2012 at 07:38 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,207
    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist View Post
    And even more here:
    (a beat up old 300D with an 18-55mm kit lens will focus faster on a contrasty starburst focus target than 1D IV with 400/2.8 II will focus on an elephant in the fog at twilight).
    I have no dog in this debate (grin) just thought Neuro's comment was worth a second telling for the humor.
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  6. #6
    Senior Member thekingb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    512
    I'm not a huge cross processing fan, but I really like the second shot of Zuni. Great action shot.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •