Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: EOS - M review - Thanks Bryan

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    I could be wrong, but I don't think many of the people who jumped on the M bandwagon will go for the M2 at a much higher price tag.

    Dave

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,207
    I didn't get the original M because of the autofocus speed and no difference in imaging, etc. I am very interested in the M2 if has the dual pixel sensor.
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,768
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Throgmartin View Post
    I could be wrong, but I don't think many of the people who jumped on the M bandwagon will go for the M2 at a much higher price tag.

    Dave
    I imagine it will depend upon what is released and at what price. But I've seen a lot of posts where a view finder (EVF), the dual pixel AF (DPAF) technology and maybe a headphone jack would definitely interest some people. I've seen a few references of people converting their current EOS-M to IR if the EOS-M2 is what they want.

    But mostly, I am impressed that with the sale most of the sentiment I've seen about the EOS-M went from negative to positive or at least interest. That has to help sales of the EOS-M2.

    Speaking for myself, I went from not interested in it at all, as I was looking at different offerings by Sony and Olympus vs the S100/S110, to owning the EOS-M and am willing to at least consider an upgrade, depending on details and price. So I went from potentially owning another manufacturers system to a reasonable likelihood of eventually upgrading. The view finder, faster AF, the DPAF and ergonomic features at a reasonable price would at least get me thinking about it. I have been using the EOS-M for video as people seem more comfortable with it pointing at them for awhile compared to a dSLR. I do like continuous AF in video mode but it is slow. So the DPAF would get me thinking.

  4. #4
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayaker72 View Post
    I imagine it will depend upon what is released and at what price. But I've seen a lot of posts where a view finder (EVF), the dual pixel AF (DPAF) technology and maybe a headphone jack would definitely interest some people. I've seen a few references of people converting their current EOS-M to IR if the EOS-M2 is what they want.
    I'm one of the latter - if I like the M2 offering, I'll convert my current M to an IR camera, it's just about ideal for that use.

    Personally, I would like dual pixel AF, but I don't really want an EVF - I'm assuming that will increase the size of the body, and I'd rather have it as small as possible.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •