Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 1.4 II vs 1.4III Extender

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    From what I have read, and seen in a few posts here: There is a significant improvement with the 2X III vs. the 2X II. However, there is only a marginal improvement with the 1.4X III vs. the 1.4X II.
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  2. #2
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918
    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    From what I have read and seen in a few have posted here: There is a significant improvement with the 2X III vs. the 2X II. However, there is only a marginal improvement with the 1.4X III vs. the 1.4X II.
    Correct in terms of IQ. The MkIII TCs can have improved AF performance, but that only applies to use with the MkII supertele lenses.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •