Just use DPP 4.0 It works quite well.
Just use DPP 4.0 It works quite well.
I have been using it, but sparingly. It's not Adobe CR, though. ACR is far more versatile and the controls are much better.Originally Posted by Joel Eade
One option, though tedious, is to use DPP to convert CR2 to TIFF, then "start" your workflow (using TIFFs instead of CR2). Added complexity, but you keep the control you're used to having and you haven't thrown away any bits in the process.
We're a Canon/Profoto family: five cameras, sixteen lenses, fifteen Profoto lights, too many modifiers.
Great minds think alike: that's exactly how I do the workflow with DPP. I don't bother with any of the DPP features, except to open the TIFF.
Yes....that is how I use ACR as well....just to make some basic adjustments then convert to a 16 bit tiff then on to Photoshop CC.
Have just been reading the review below and it's very interesting (if somewhat challenging at times).
http://www.clarkvision.com/reviews/e...on-canon-7dii/
It's sad that we lost Daniel to the dark side.
Canon EOS 7D, EF-S 10-22, EF 24-105L, EF 50 f1.2L, EF 70-300L, 430EX.
"Criticism is something you can easily avoid, by saying nothing, doing nothing and being nothing." - Tara Moss
Actually I have been disappointed with DPP and the 7D II. There is not much head room for improvement and I am not sure if it is the camera or DPP. If it is the camera it does say quit a bit about the 7D II's in camera performance, but I am hoping that when LR does an update I am able to improve with RAW files.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote