Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: Looks like I am going to be getting the 100-400L II a lot sooner than I expected.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,368
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    Looking at the charts I have decided the 100-400mm is not a lens I will want to own, at least yet anyway. I am selling my 300mm f/2.8L and will need something in that range.
    What kind of capabilities/features were you looking for in the replacement lens?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Setters View Post
    What kind of capabilities/features were you looking for in the replacement lens?
    Small, compact and the highest IQ.

    Really the 100-400mm fits that bill.
    But knowing myself I will end up with just two I am choosing from.
    The 300mm f/2.8L II or the 400mm DO II.
    It will probably end up being the 300mm.

    I debated for to long between the 600mm and 500mm II, I just couldn't make the decision.

    I finally made the decision and today I am waiting on the big brown truck to arrive. I went with the 500mm II because of the size and weight.
    That said the 400mm DO may be to close to the 500mm for it to be a contender.

  3. #3
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by HDNitehawk View Post
    Small, compact and the highest IQ.

    Really the 100-400mm fits that bill.
    But knowing myself I will end up with just two I am choosing from.
    The 300mm f/2.8L II or the 400mm DO II.
    It will probably end up being the 300mm.

    I debated for to long between the 600mm and 500mm II, I just couldn't make the decision.

    I finally made the decision and today I am waiting on the big brown truck to arrive. I went with the 500mm II because of the size and weight.
    That said the 400mm DO may be to close to the 500mm for it to be a contender.
    I was hoping someone would get the 400 DO so I could see if it is a worthwhile lens or not. And I was kind of hoping it would be you because you are very thurough and particular in you assessments.

    Go ahead... give it a try so I can live vicariously; and even better, find a problem so I can keep my wallet intact.
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    I was hoping someone would get the 400 DO so I could see if it is a worthwhile lens or not. And I was kind of hoping it would be you because you are very thurough and particular in you assessments.

    Go ahead... give it a try so I can live vicariously; and even better, find a problem so I can keep my wallet intact.
    I have a feeling that once I bought the 400mm I wouldn't find anything wrong with it. I would just end up encouraging you to buy it and your wallet would be ravaged.

    My new 500 just showed up, the box had a hole punched in the side of it during shipping and the UPS guy had placed tape over it. It was at a spot that it shouldn't have hurt anything.
    I think the best you can hope for is I have buyers remorse or that something is wrong with the 500mm, I send it back and try the 400mm instead. I suspect that will not happen either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •