Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Extenders 1.4x vs 2.0x

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    205
    Well, I don't really NEED the reach but it'd be handy. I just figured a $500 extender would be better value than a $2800 lens that I wouldn't use too often. There's only bee na few times I've needed the reach so far, but both times were a pain.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dave Throgmartin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northern Illinois
    Posts
    1,061
    Quote Originally Posted by Squidy View Post
    Well, I don't really NEED the reach but it'd be handy. I just figured a $500 extender would be better value than a $2800 lens that I wouldn't use too often. There's only bee na few times I've needed the reach so far, but both times were a pain.
    If you're ok with the Gen II extenders I think you could get the 1.4x version for less than $200.

    Dave

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Squidy View Post
    Well, I don't really NEED the reach but it'd be handy. I just figured a $500 extender would be better value than a $2800 lens that I wouldn't use too often. There's only bee na few times I've needed the reach so far, but both times were a pain.

    Do not buy the 1.4x version III. I am not sure you would even see a benefit from the new version III with your lens. I bought the version III when it came out and for the older lenses the improvement was negligible. If you had the newer 70x200 2.8L IS II then I would get the version III.

    Instead see if you can find the 1.4x Version II, you should be able to pick it up for a few hundred.

    And I wouldn't even consider any version of the 2x with your lens. The IQ just wouldn't be there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •