Lens dilemma, seeking advice

[Photog82]

I've had some time to think and experiment. I am going to keep the 16-35 f/4; it's a really nice lens- not perfect for astro great for landscapes (hoping to get some really good winter shots this year) and I even used it well for a portrait session to bring out the setting for 2 scenes. I'm also going to keep the 35 1.4 II; I've used it a bit for family gatherings, portraits and am starting to get used to using it for those certain situations.

One thing that I'm still debating on is the 24-105II vs 24-70II. The 24-105 fits my landscape needs when I don't want UWA and has the zoom I sometimes need and the 24-70 has that low aperture for inside shots of family gatherings, portraits, etc. I could use it for landscapes but no IS and the shorter range is a downer. I've read so many reviews where people have replaced their 24-105 with the 24-70 as their walk around lens but everyone uses lenses differently.

I may table to 24-70 for awhile and put the $ towards the 85 1.2II (or do I want to wait for the rumored 85 1.4? wish it were the 85 1.2 III).

It's concerning when you put all of your assets into Excel and tally up everything with what you have already.