Sean's Recent Shoot: Panos Galore

[DavidEccleston]

Sorry to break it to you Sean, but you're going to have to head back. This time, remember to bring zombie makeup and clothes for the model. Or not zombie, but something else to go with the run-down motel.

(ps. Nice shots. )

[Sean Setters]

Such a high standard you set yourself Sean and you consistently maintain that. Your work has a signature look and feel to it, great subject separation from the background. I get to see a few pretty girl in grungey location shots, but yours are at another level to most out there.

I feel you could work on a calendar/portfolio type body of work where your model almost leaps out of her location with the separation/3D effect you have mastered.

Great series.

I appreciate that Steve. The unfortunate side effect of my style is that people think it's Photoshopped.

"You mean you were actually there??"


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

[Steve U]

I appreciate that Steve. The unfortunate side effect of my style is that people think it's Photoshopped.

"You mean you were actually there??"


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

As well as a Copywrite, you might need a "No chromakey products were used" disclaimer.

[nvitalephotography]

I appreciate that Steve. The unfortunate side effect of my style is that people think it's Photoshopped.

"You mean you were actually there??"

That's what it is!...I was just trying to figure out what it was about your shots. They do tend to look like a composite like so many photographers do these days. But actually doing it on location is way better.

[Sean Setters]

That's what it is!...I was just trying to figure out what it was about your shots. They do tend to look like a composite like so many photographers do these days. But actually doing it on location is way better.

Truth is, I don't hate Photoshop; however, I'd rather spend and hour setting up and breaking down equipment to get 5-7 photos I really like (that are 95% complete in camera) than to spend the same hour working on one image that never actually happened.

[cls]

I appreciate that Steve. The unfortunate side effect of my style is that people think it's Photoshopped.

"You mean you were actually there??"


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

+1 on Steve's comment - great execution as usual.

Regarding the Photoshopped/composite look, that's pretty much what you're after, isn't it? And if people really think it's Photoshopped you could see it as a positive thing. (The strong subject/background separation provided both by totally different lighting on the model compared to the background and by the actual distance to the background really does make it look a bit like a composite.)

What you could try is a series with a mixture of your "usual setup shots" and some other shots. E.g. if there would have been a couple of shots of her leaning on the sign or sitting on the brick wall among the other shots, no one would question you were there. And maybe that would have increased the wow-factor of your strobe setup shots even more.

[Sean Setters]

What you could try is a series with a mixture of your "usual setup shots" and some other shots. E.g. if there would have been a couple of shots of her leaning on the sign or sitting on the brick wall among the other shots, no one would question you were there. And maybe that would have increased the wow-factor of your strobe setup shots even more.

When showing people examples of my work on my Nexus 7 tablet, I have a gallery that's nothing but setup shots. Once I show them the "regular" shots, I say something like, "And here's a few examples of how those images were created..."

It usually isn't until they see the setup shots that they release that I'm pretty serious about what I do. :-)

[ham]

I think you've misunderstood cls, or I have!

I think when he says your "usual setup shots" he means your high subject:background separation shots.

So you show them some "normal" shots of her sitting on the sign etc. then pop the high s:b separation shots in for the wow effect.

A "how I set it up" shot is great too though.

[Sean Setters]

I think you've misunderstood cls, or I have!

I was just just explaining how I currently use a similar technique to show people that it isn't Photoshop, it's photography. :-)

[ham]

Fair enough.

Photography > Photoshopraphy