Just came across this website where someone built a device for automated focus stacking: http://davidhunt.ie/?p=2826
Maybe not great for out in the field, but useful in the studio?
Enjoy,
Just came across this website where someone built a device for automated focus stacking: http://davidhunt.ie/?p=2826
Maybe not great for out in the field, but useful in the studio?
Enjoy,
Arnt
You could also have someone like the FoCal/Magic Lantern folks use the AFMA for stacking.
Words get in the way of what I meant to say.
I ran across that the other day and almost created a news post on it. ;-)
Yes, I imagine you could. However, I don't think you wouldn't get as much range (DOF) out of that as you would manually moving the camera as David Hunt does in his modified flatbed scanner setup.
Agreed.. Until you introduce a micro motor that mounts to a RRS rail. Set speed based on frames per second
Words get in the way of what I meant to say.
There is focus stacking software, such as Helicon Focus and Zerene Stacker. The former (and probably the latter, but I have Helicon) can control the focus of a tethered camera with an AF lens, and create a stack. The problem is focus breathing - changing focus changes magnification and FoV. A shallow stack is ok, deep ones less so.
Moving the camera is the solution. It can be done manually with a macro rail, but accuracy is low.
The homebuilt contraption is nice...but too much work. My intention is to get a Cognysis StackShot.
I use Helicon and the RRS B 150 focusing rail. I also use the Novoflex Balcan-AF below, which has a similar rail function in addition to the below. They are both manual, but for my use I cannot say I have had real accuracy issues. If I increased magnification beyond what I do, I´m sure that would change.
I must admit that I don´t do this very often, but in general I am quite pleased with the results. The only problem is perspective. Moving the camera flattens the perspective, which in some cases ruins the picture. If anyone can provide a way to fix that (my photoshop skills sucks), I would probably do it more often.