Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Opinons and Thoughts please...

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    382

    Opinons and Thoughts please...

    I own a Canon T3i. I'm very happy with it. Recently i rented the 400mm 5.6 and loved it! I am seriously considering purchasing this lens brand new.
    However, a friend is selling a 5D MKII in really good shape. He wants $1300. Roughly the same price as the new 400mm. I can't afford both….suggestions? thoughts?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    That is to much for a 5D II.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Kayaker72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire, USA
    Posts
    5,665
    For $1,300, I would watch for a sale on the 6D if you want to go FF. It should be a significant upgrade over the T3i. But, just factor in the total cost. In other words, do you have the lenses you'd want if you suddenly went FF?

  4. #4
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Agree with both above... too much for a 5dII, and you would be better off with a 6d.

    One other point though - Going full frame would make everything seem even further away. You lose the crop factor and would need to crop more in post or get closer. If you go full frame that 400mm may seem a little short.
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  5. #5
    Senior Member Kombi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    Agree with both above... too much for a 5dII, and you would be better off with a 6d.

    One other point though - Going full frame would make everything seem even further away. You lose the crop factor and would need to crop more in post or get closer. If you go full frame that 400mm may seem a little short.
    X2

    Also keep in mind the 5D uses CF cards not SD and the 6D sd cards. one less expense in transition.

    But.. In the long run a good lens is better than the popular body of the moment.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,466
    I agree too. Wasn't there a news item in the last day or two, with the 6D being $1000? From what I've read, the bad thing about the 6D is that only the center focus point is good... but from what I've read, the 5DmkII didn't have spectacular AF either. The 6D is new, with warranty, shoots in lower light... vs. the 5DmkII, used, no warranty, and limited high-ISO range. The 6D probably has a pop-up flash than can act as a master too.

    Now, as for the 6D vs. 400mm question, that's a question that only you can answer. Do you need cleaner at high-ISO images? Go 6D. Do you shoot landscapes or portraits? Go 6D. Do you shoot wildlife or sports where you need the 400mm reach? Go for the lens.
    On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
    R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Steilacoom, WA
    Posts
    77
    No pop up flash on the 6D.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    382
    Thanks everyone. Great feedback.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by Manofmayo66 View Post
    No pop up flash on the 6D.
    Wow, you're right. That's surprising (that it's not there, not that you're right. ) They typically leave it off the upper-end bodies, knowing they won't use the built-in, but the 6D isn't upper end... Perhaps is was a cost savings move, to get a reasonably priced full-frame body out.
    On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
    R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L

  10. #10
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,366
    Canon has never put a pop-up flash on a full-frame body. I think Canon believes that full-frame users are more likely to purchase accessories for the ability to control other flashes from the camera and less likely to use a relatively weak (and ill-placed) pop-up flash for primary lighting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •