Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 1.4 II vs 1.4III Extender

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    88

    1.4 II vs 1.4III Extender

    I did a brief search and did not find an answer to my question. I currently own two bodies, the first is a 60D (that I rarely use any more) and a 5DIII that I use regularly. I own a 70-200isII and a 400 5.6. I use my 1.4II extender often with the 5dIII and the 400 5.6. While I am happy with the results, I know they could be better. Some day I hope to purchase a 500 or 600mm lens for wildlife and birding, but for now they are just not in the budget.


    I read a lot about the series III extenders when they were introduced a few years ago. I am almost certain I read that with the 60D and the 400 5.6 lens it made no sense to 'upgrade' from the 1.4II I own to the 1.4 version III extender, am I correct in my assumption? Does the same hold true with my 5dIII, will I benefit with the newer version of the 1.4 (or 2.0)extender? I seem to recall that the version III extenders were geared towards the version II lenses that were introduced in the last few years (300 2.8II, 400 2.8II, 500 4.0II and the 6004.0 II).


    Btw, the 400 5.6 combined with the 1.4 extender does a pretty good job of focusing on the 5dIII. Yes it's f8 wide open, but with good lighting its quite usable.
    Scott

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    3,110
    You wouldn't see enough difference between the two to make it worth the upgrade to the III.
    If you get one of the other listed lenses it would.

    Bodies are not going to matter, it is the lens you are using that will matter.

    The 2x would be a different story, you might see some improvement with it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    From what I have read, and seen in a few posts here: There is a significant improvement with the 2X III vs. the 2X II. However, there is only a marginal improvement with the 1.4X III vs. the 1.4X II.
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  4. #4
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,878
    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    From what I have read and seen in a few have posted here: There is a significant improvement with the 2X III vs. the 2X II. However, there is only a marginal improvement with the 1.4X III vs. the 1.4X II.
    Correct in terms of IQ. The MkIII TCs can have improved AF performance, but that only applies to use with the MkII supertele lenses.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    88
    Thank you for the quick response, makes perfect sense. I'll stick to my 1.4II for now.
    Scott

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •