Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: monopod or tripod?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5

    monopod or tripod?



    im looking into buying a 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L IS USM lens and im just not sure to get a tripod or monopod? shooting mainly sports?if that makes any difference.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    325

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    monopod

  3. #3
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,918

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    For sports, a monopod will work better - it enables you to move around much more easily.

  4. #4
    Administrator Sean Setters's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    3,368

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    Quote Originally Posted by neuroanatomist


    For sports, a monopod will work better - it enables you to move around much more easily.
    <div style="clear: both;"]</div>


    I'd agree with both opinions above. However, I'd add that a decent panning head (like an Induro PHQ) or an even higher-end panning head would might work well for things like motor sports where the paths of motion are constant and repeatable.

  5. #5

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    Quote Originally Posted by Sean Setters


    (like an Induro PHQ)



    The Induro has "quintaxial positioning" -- how can you go wrong? []


    Seriously, monopod. Feisol rocks, IMHO: rock solid, low price. Add a Manfrotto 234RC quick-release/tilt head and you're in great shape with the 100-400

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,163

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    Definitely a monopod, unless you're shooting video.


    You certainly don't need a tripod for stability while shooting high speed frame rates for sports. As stated above the monopod gives you much more mobility, as well as a smaller footprint near the sidelines, and it also enables you to get out of the way of a play more easily, as well as move around with the action of the game.


    Also, a tripod definitely doesn't set-up as well in crowds or near; steps, seats, or the stands were people around you would tend to bump into it more easily.


    Rich

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    233

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    I think this will be pretty much unanimous; a monopod with a good head -- second the 234RC.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    743

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    Forget either the monopod or tripod. I think you should try to handhold the the 100-400 before you consider getting support for it. That lens is not hard to handhold for couple of hours.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,163

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    That's a good point, that particular lens is definitely hand holdable.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,304

    Re: monopod or tripod?



    Quote Originally Posted by Sinh Nhut Nguyen


    Forget either the monopod or tripod. I think you should try to handhold the the 100-400 before you consider getting support for it. That lens is not hard to handhold for couple of hours.



    +1


    for sports a tri- or monopod isn't really necessary and I prefer shooting without one. It's way more versatile. Unless you're sitting in a row with 20 other photographers and you don't have room to move(like those guys along the line at the WC Soccer these days..), try without.


    Jan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •