Page 260 of 302 FirstFirst ... 160210250258259260261262270 ... LastLast
Results 2,591 to 2,600 of 3974

Thread: Post your best current shots

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Big Mouse Florida
    Posts
    1,174
    I certainly agree. Did you do any dark frame subtraction, etc?

    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    This thread has been getting some nice shots posted lately... please keep it up.

    Here is one from last night. I wanted to see if the 5DS R could replace my 1DX for low light situations. I think it did good.

    Thanks for looking.

    Pat
    If you see me with a wrench, call 911

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    1,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles View Post
    I certainly agree. Did you do any dark frame subtraction, etc?
    No idea if he used that mode, but isn't that what the long-exposure noise reduction does automatically?
    On Flickr - Namethatnobodyelsetook on Flickr
    R8 | R7 | 7DII | 10-18mm STM | 24-70mm f/4L | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 70-300mm f/4-5.6L | RF 100-500mm f/4-5-7.1L

  3. #3
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by DavidEccleston View Post
    No idea if he used that mode, but isn't that what the long-exposure noise reduction does automatically?
    I think you are correct, but I did not use it. I usually don't use long exposure NR for a couple of reasons, but mostly because I am too impatient to wait the extra 30 seconds for the shot to be done. Pretty sad... but more true than I care to admit. I would also like to have control of noise reduction, and don't like to rely on the camera for that.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  4. #4
    Senior Member conropl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    West Michigan
    Posts
    1,466
    Quote Originally Posted by Busted Knuckles View Post
    I certainly agree. Did you do any dark frame subtraction, etc?
    No dark frames. Just a single shot. Tried both ISO 1600 & 3200, both looked acceptable. I actually had to darken the sky a bit and add contrast to get the sky to look more like night time. Both of which add noise, but it still held up nice. Better than I thought it would.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
    5DS R, 1D X, 7D, Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6, 24mm f/1.4L II, 16-35mm f/4L IS, 24-105mm f/4L, 50mm f/1.8, 100mm Macro f/2.8L, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L, 580EX-II
    flickr

  5. #5
    Senior Member neuroanatomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    3,845
    Quote Originally Posted by conropl View Post
    No dark frames. Just a single shot. Tried both ISO 1600 & 3200, both looked acceptable. I actually had to darken the sky a bit and add contrast to get the sky to look more like night time. Both of which add noise, but it still held up nice. Better than I thought it would.
    Best not to use the in-camera long exposure NR – doing so actually *adds* random noise. It's good for removing hot/stuck pixels, but RAW converters do that anyway. When subtracting a dark frame, the random noise is in different places in the two frames, so you're effectively summing the noise (the way to remove random noise is to average frames). The noise addition with LENR isn't really noticeable at low ISO, but at higher ISO settings like 1600+, you'll see it.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    East Central Illinois
    Posts
    850
    Hereford Cathedral, Wales


    Hereford Cathedral
    by Mark Johnson, on Flickr
    Mark - Flickr
    ************************

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Kentucky
    Posts
    3,615
    A shot with the new 5D MKIV + Canon 24-70mm IS USM II @70mm
    ISO 8000
    1/320
    f/3.2
    EXposure bias - 1/3 stop
    No flash

    Image converted to 16 bit TIFF in DPP4, moved to photoshop, cropped slightly and then converted to JPEG that is all, no other processing


    Last edited by Joel Eade; 09-10-2016 at 02:25 PM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    464
    Quote Originally Posted by Joel Eade View Post
    A shot with the new 5D MKIV + Canon 24-70mm IS USM II @70mm
    ISO 8000
    1/320
    f/3.2
    EXposure bias - 1/3 stop
    No flash





    Image converted to 16 bit TIFF in DPP4, moved to photoshop, cropped slightly and then converted to JPEG that is all, no other processing



    Looks great. Completely non-scientific, but this looks to me like less noise in the shadows than I would expect from ISO 6400 on my 5D III.

    Thanks for the sample. And a charming picture, too!

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Kentucky
    Posts
    3,615


    5D MKIV
    Canon 24-70mm IS USM II @ 38mm
    ISO 100
    1/125
    f/5.6

    Converted with DPP and Processed in Photoshop CC 2015.5

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Kentucky
    Posts
    3,615
    Light through the trees



    5DS R
    Canon 17-40mm @ 40mm
    ISO 400
    1/80
    f/5.6

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •